The Dysology Hypothesis
Letting scholars get away with publishing fallacies and myths signals to others the existence of topics where guardians of good scholarship might be less capable than elsewhere. Such dysology then serves as an allurement to poor scholars to disseminate existing myths and fallacies and to create and publish their own in these topic areas, which leads to a downward spiral of diminishing veracity on particular topics.
Sunday, 14 April 2013
Wikipedia seeking to improve its reputation for dreadful unreliability through toxic "experts are scum" stealth plagiarism policy
Wikipedia is trying to improve its notorious reputation for unreliably by deliberately plagiarizing my work, and that of other myth busters, under the officially published Wikipedia 'master editor' policy that "experts are scum". Read the shocking story, and its dreadful implications for veracity, here.